翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Hibbert ・ R v Hinks ・ R v Holland ・ R v Horncastle ・ R v Hughes ・ R v Hughes (Canada) ・ R v Huhne ・ R v Hundal ・ R v Hutt ・ R v Hydro-Québec ・ R v Incedal ・ R v Instan ・ R v JA ・ R v Jim ・ R v Jobidon ・ R v Jones ・ R v Jordan ・ R v Jorgensen ・ R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge ・ R v K ・ R v Kang-Brown ・ R v Kapp ・ R v Keegstra ・ R v Kewelram ・ R v Khan ・ R v Khan (South Africa) ・ R v Khelawon ・ R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ・ R v Korsten ・ R v Kouri Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Jones ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Jones ''R v Jones'', () 2 S.C.R. 284 is an early leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the freedom of religion under section 2(a) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' and the right to security of person under section 7. ==Background== Thomas Jones was a pastor in a fundamentalist church who did not want his three children educated in school and instead was teaching them himself in the basement of the church. The Alberta ''Schools Act'' requires all parents to send their children to school unless the parent can show that they are going to an accredited private school or the government has approved the home-school curriculum. Jones was charged with truancy under the ''Schools Act''. Jones argued that the rule requiring government approval to educate his children involves "his acknowledging that the government, rather than God, has the final authority over the education of his children"〔para. 19〕 and so contravenes his right to freedom of religion under section 2(a) and his right to have control over how his children are educated which is protected under section 7. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Jones」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.